ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia: From Serendipity to Precision Biological Ablation.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), particularly refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), pose a significant therapeutic challenge and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. For patients who do not respond to conventional therapies, including antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation (CA), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)-also known as stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR)-has emerged as a promising non-invasive alternative. This review synthesizes current clinical evidence from prospective trials, retrospective series, and case reports that collectively demonstrate the efficacy of STAR in reducing VT burden and improving quality of life. This review also explores the evolving understanding of the associated underlying biological mechanisms, which appear to involve a complex interplay between early electrophysiological conduction reprogramming and delayed structural myocardial remodeling mediated by inflammation and fibrosis. Finally, we address the critical technical considerations, including patient selection, target delineation using multimodal imaging and electroanatomic mapping, motion management, and treatment planning, which are essential for the safe and effective delivery of STAR. While short-term outcomes are encouraging, ongoing research is needed to optimize dosing, refine techniques, and establish long-term efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.