ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2026
Disproportionality analysis of off-label intravitreal bevacizumab in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.
Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent initially approved for cancer treatment, is widely used off-label in retinal vascular diseases; however, this use may carry safety risks, particularly when evidence from controlled clinical trials is limited. In this context, real-world evidence derived from large pharmacovigilance databases plays a critical role in evaluating its safety profile. Objectives: Evaluate the safety profile of off-label intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of retinal vascular diseases using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Design: Disproportionality analysis using data mining of the FAERS database. Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of intravitreal bevacizumab from Q1 2015 to Q2 2025 were extracted, and data mining methods (reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network) were applied to identify statistical disproportionality. In addition, a comparative risk analysis (odds ratio) was performed against ranibizumab. Results: Of the 1495 ICSRs (5232 adverse events (AEs)), 114 preferred terms were statistically significant in the disproportionality analyses; 52% were expected, 15% were related to lack of efficacy and 33% were unexpected. Furthermore, the comparative analysis suggests a higher risk of serious cardiovascular, ocular and systemic events with ranibizumab. Conclusion: Most of the disproportionately reported AEs associated with bevacizumab were expected or related to product handling, underscoring the importance of using approved single-dose formulations. While this analysis suggests a lower risk of serious systemic AEs with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab, this finding should be interpreted with caution, as disproportionality analyses based on spontaneous reporting systems cannot confirm causal associations. Further evidence is needed to confirm the observed associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.