ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Cardiovascular Disease, Sleep-Disordered Breathing, and Artificial Intelligence: From Neutral Trials to Precision Sleep Cardiology.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), which includes both obstructive and central sleep apnea, is highly prevalent among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Moreover, SDB contributes significantly to the development and progression of hypertension, coronary artery disease, arrhythmias, heart failure, and various cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. However, despite strong mechanistic links involving intermittent hypoxemia, sympathetic activation, intrathoracic pressure fluctuations, and systemic inflammation, clinical trials of SDB treatment have yielded in neutral or even adverse cardiovascular outcomes. These results underscore the need for refined phenotyping, risk stratification, and personalized management. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool to address these challenges. In this review, we evaluate the mechanistic pathways through which SDB affects cardiovascular health and critically examine AI-based methods to enhance screening, outcome prediction, and treatment optimization. Applications include automated detection using clinical and biosignal data, cardiovascular risk prediction through machine-learning models based on sleep parameters, and AI-guided therapy personalization. Furthermore, we emphasize translational relevance by comparing model performance, identifying high-risk phenotypes, and exploring the potential for integration into clinical workflows. AI-enabled tools may help bridge the gap between pathophysiological understanding and improved outcomes by facilitating earlier diagnosis, tailored interventions, and proactive monitoring. Future studies should focus on prospective validation, regulatory pathways, and equitable deployment across populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.