Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534214›Full record

ArticleAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England)2026

Management practices and welfare of working equids in Mogalakwena local municipality, Limpopo Province, South Africa.

Dimakatso Betty Molapo, Cheryl M E McCrindle, Tulisiwe Pilisiwe Mbombo-Dweba, James Wabwire Oguttu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal welfare (South Mimms, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dimakatso Betty MolapoDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, South Africa.
Cheryl M E McCrindleDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, South Africa.
Tulisiwe Pilisiwe Mbombo-DwebaDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, South Africa.
James Wabwire OguttuDepartment of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-4437

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes the management and welfare aspects of Working Equids (WEs) in Limpopo Province, South Africa by utilising a cross-sectional study design with data collected via a semi-structured questionnaire. All households with WEs were invited to participate in the study, and 111 volunteered to take part. Approximately half (50; 45%) of respondents did not have a regular feeding schedule for their WEs, while 92 (79%) did not provide supplementary feeding during times when pastures were poor. None of the equid owners (EOs) surveyed had their equids vaccinated while 88.29 and 53.15% failed to provide treatment for internal and external parasites, respectively. Most respondents (79.28%) treated sick animals themselves with 6.31% doing nothing when the animal was ill. A small proportion (5.41%) expressed the sentiment that equids, in particular donkeys, do not get sick. Most (77.48%), on a daily basis worked their equids for 3-6 h, while 2.7% worked them for 7-11 h. Over half (57.66%) indicated that per day their equids covered 0-4 km per day, with only 2.7% reporting that their equids travelled more than 10 km per day. Although 99.10% of respondents allowed their equids to rest during the day, loads remained on the animals during rest time. Within our study area WEs are exposed to the negative effects of inadequate management, and negative stereotypes towards equids, especially donkeys, persist among EOs. The welfare of WEs needs to be prioritised in order for their well-being to improve.

Indexed as

Animal welfaredonkeysequine ownerslivelihoodssocial positionsupplementary feedingveterinary services

Identifiers

PMID42534214
PMCPMC13419466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.