ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Intraoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review of Risk Factors and Management Strategies.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia. A less studied presentation of AF is intraoperative atrial fibrillation (IOAF), which is defined as AF occurring during surgery. IOAF has important clinical implications, as this condition is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, even in non-cardiac surgical procedures. A narrative review of studies published between 1990 and 2025 was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library to evaluate the risk factors and management of IOAF in non-cardiac surgery. Reported IOAF prevalence varies by procedure type, ranging from 1% to 5% in most non-cardiac surgeries. Across non-cardiac surgical procedures, three IOAF risk domains emerge: patient profile, including age, prior AF, and structural heart disease; the invasiveness of the procedure; acute triggers, including hypotension and electrolyte imbalance. Management of IOAF begins with rapid assessment of hemodynamic stability and identification of surgical triggers. In hemodynamically unstable patients, particularly those with myocardial ischemia or pulmonary edema, immediate synchronized direct-current cardioversion (DCCV) is indicated. Conversely, in hemodynamically stable patients, the "3As" management framework is usually followed: first, acute triggers are addressed; then, the AF rate or rhythm is controlled; finally, anticoagulation is considered using the CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.