ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026
Time to antibiotic administration in intra-amniotic infections: impact of cefoxitin monotherapy versus traditional antibiotic therapy.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study addresses treatment of intra-amniotic infection (IAI) by comparing timely receipt of recommended antibiotic administration between cefoxitin and traditional antimicrobial therapy, ampicillin and gentamicin, with or without clindamycin. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large, multi-site health system. The combination therapy group treated with ampicillin plus gentamicin, with or without clindamycin from June 2022 to May 2023, was compared to patients treated with cefoxitin from June 2023 to May 2024, following an institutional guideline update. Participants: Pregnant individuals aged 16 and older with diagnosed or presumed IAI were included. Results: Three hundred patients were included, 150 each in both the combination therapy and cefoxitin groups. Baseline characteristics were similar between the combination therapy and cefoxitin patients. Vaginal delivery was the most common mode of delivery, and rates of cesarean delivery were similar between groups. Most patients had a negative group B Conclusions: Cefoxitin for IAI significantly improves timeliness of recommended antibiotic treatment, aligning with current guideline recommendations for prompt therapy. The absence of differences in secondary outcomes supports the clinical efficacy of cefoxitin and its consideration as a first-line agent in the management of IAI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.