ArticleCureus2026
Perceptions of General Dental Practitioners Regarding Do-It-Yourself Aligners: A Cross-Sectional Survey in East Bangalore.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives To assess the perception of general dental practitioners in East Bangalore regarding the concept of do-it-yourself (DIY) aligners. Materials and methods A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 114 general dental practitioners practicing in East Bangalore. A validated electronic questionnaire comprising 19 questions was distributed online. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses, and comparisons between practitioners familiar and unfamiliar with DIY aligners were performed using the Chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results Among the 114 participants, 59 (51.8%) were familiar with the concept of DIY aligners, while 55 (48.2%) were unfamiliar. Regarding the primary purpose of DIY aligners, 66.1% of familiar practitioners and 41.8% of unfamiliar practitioners identified correction of minor tooth movements such as spacing and mild crowding as the main indication. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in their perception of the primary purpose of DIY aligners (p=0.02). Practitioners familiar with DIY aligners were more likely to report having encountered patients who used DIY aligners without professional guidance (42.4% vs. 14.5%; p=0.001) and to have observed complications arising from unsupervised use (37.3% vs. 16.4%; p=0.02). Significant differences were also found regarding the frequency of patient inquiries about DIY aligners (p<0.001) and perceived cost-effectiveness (p=0.04). Conclusion General dental practitioners demonstrated varying levels of familiarity with DIY aligners. Practitioners familiar with the concept were more likely to encounter patients using DIY aligners and to report complications associated with their unsupervised use. Overall, concerns regarding potential risks highlight the importance of professional supervision in orthodontic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.