SynthesisJournal of military, veteran and family health2025
Abortion in a military population: A review of the literature.
Synthesis in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Abortion is recognized by the World Health Organization as a fundamental part of good reproductive care, and worldwide three of 10 pregnancies will end in abortion. In a military context, the number of women in the armed forces (AF) worldwide increases each year, with an average of 12.5% across North Atlantic Treaty Organization member states in 2021. Despite the increasing number of women in the AF, little is known about their abortion experiences, or even the prevalence. Methods: This systematic search of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles, and bibliographies were screened. Qualitative themes were determined by two authors using iterative thematic analysis. Results: Twenty-three articles were identified; eight met the inclusion criteria. All but one focused on a U.S. population. Three themes emerged: rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion, accessibility to abortion care, and reasons for abortion. In the majority of studies, service women (SW) had an increased rate of unintended pregnancies but a lower abortion rate. SW face policy, logistical, and institutional barriers to accessing abortion, in addition to those faced by the civilian population. Discussion: Overall, there is a paucity of information on abortion in the AF worldwide. This review highlights the need for nation-specific research into SW's experience of abortion and provides guidance on how to do so to enhance understanding and lead to evidence-based national policy on abortion for AF personnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.