Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534134›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026

Respiratory multiplex PCR and antimicrobial treatment modification in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Hülya Çaşkurlu, Halenur Vural Akbal, Hatice Kübra Uçar, Esra Koçoğlu, Özlem Aydın, Pınar Ergen, Yasemin Çağ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hülya ÇaşkurluDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6760-2052
Halenur Vural AkbalDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8947-6758
Hatice Kübra UçarDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0439-701X
Esra KoçoğluDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2860-1794
Özlem AydınDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0398-9216
Pınar ErgenDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3990-7956
Yasemin ÇağDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-0308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of hospitalization, and pathogen identification is often limited by low diagnostic yield of conventional microbiological methods. Respiratory multiplex PCR (mPCR) enables rapid pathogen detection, but its role in antimicrobial treatment modification for inpatients with CAP remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between mPCR testing and antimicrobial modification in hospitalized patients with CAP. Methods: This retrospective, single center cohort study included hospitalized patients with CAP identified using ICD-10 codes between July 2023 and February 2025. Respiratory mPCR was performed within the first 24 hours of admission using combined nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal (NP/OP) swabs. The primary outcome was antimicrobial treatment modification guided by mPCR results and documented by physicians. Secondary outcomes included antimicrobial de-escalation and hospital length of stay. Results: In this cohort of 145 patients, mPCR detected a pathogen in 56 patients (38.6%): viral pathogens in 30 (20.7%) and bacterial pathogens in 26 (17.9%). Overall antimicrobial treatment was modified in 54 patients (37.2%). Modification guided by mPCR results and documented by physicians occurred in 37 patients (25.5%). Among these 37 modifications, 35 (94.6%) were classified as antimicrobial de-escalation. Hospital length of stay did not differ significantly across mPCR results. Conclusions: In hospitalized patients with CAP, mPCR facilitates targeted antimicrobial treatment modification and drives high rates of de-escalation. These findings demonstrate the significant utility of mPCR in optimizing clinical decisions and enhancing antimicrobial stewardship.

Identifiers

PMID42534134
PMCPMC13419413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.