ArticleJournal of family violence2024
Safety Planning Interventions for Adults Who Experience Interpersonal Violence: A Systematic Review.
Article in Journal of family violence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Safety planning is a tool to minimize the safety concerns of people experiencing violence, predominantly women and within the context of intimate partner violence (IPV). This systematic review aims to examine the state of safety planning and provide an overview of the effectiveness and perceived impact of digital, in-person and hybrid safety planning interventions. Method: PRISMA guidelines were used. Reports of primary qualitative or quantitative research assessing any interpersonal violence outcome for adults (exclusively ≥18 years old) experiencing violence were included if conducted between 2012 and 2022. Searches occurred between October and December 2022. Spanish and Portuguese sources were derived from SciElo, French sources from OpenEdition, and English sources from MedLine, PsychINFO, and Academic Search Complete. Risk of bias was assessed. Data were screened by 6 investigators and extracted by 2. Results: Of the 1,091 appraised studies, 15 were deemed suitable. All interventions centered on IPV, and none addressed other forms of interpersonal violence. Included studies were in English. Studies examined numerous outcomes with inconsistent findings. All hybrid interventions were effective (n=3). Conclusions: Safety planning can lead to amelioration in multiple domains for IPV survivors. Studies including safety planning in their control conditions might report inaccurate conclusions. IPV research would benefit from expanding study populations to include underserved populations. Hybrid interventions with populations experiencing comorbid conditions offer promise. No clinical trials assessing the efficacy of safety planning interventions for other forms of interpersonal violence were identified. Safety planning regarding other forms of interpersonal violence is in its nascence. (250 words).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.