ReviewJournal of military, veteran and family health2023
Putting your best weighted foot forward: Reviewing lower extremity injuries by sex in weighted military marching.
Review in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Nijmegen Marches are an annual event in which military participants complete four consecutive days of 40-kilometre marches. Load carriage requirements differ among nations. The objective of this review is to apply a Gender-based Analysis Plus (GBA+) lens to injury prevention and consider the appropriateness of sex-based load carriage requirements. Methods: Two independent literature searches were undertaken using the MEDLINE database. A title and abstract screening review was conducted of articles reporting on gait biomechanics or injury risk related to load carriage that were published in English in the past 30 years. Thirteen articles were included in the review. Results: Four studies looked at sex-specific biomechanical adaptations to load carriage, with two reporting no significant differences and two reporting differences that may increase the risk of hip or knee injuries among women. Individuals who marched with a stride length longer than their natural or preferred length had more range of motion in their lower extremities and greater impact force; thus, they may be at a higher risk of injury. Weight carried was also identified as a risk factor, but the literature suggests that both sexes respond similarly to increased load as a proportion of body mass. Discussion: On the basis of the literature reviewed, no evidence-based recommendations can be made for sex-specific load carriage requirements in endurance marching. The published literature suggests that event standards for load carriage based on individual characteristics such as body weight or height may be more effective for injury prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.