Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534120›Full record

ReviewJournal of military, veteran and family health2023

Putting your best weighted foot forward: Reviewing lower extremity injuries by sex in weighted military marching.

Jacinta McNairn, Justin Tait, Madeline Harlow, Peter Yang, Brian Beaudette, Paul Dhillon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacinta McNairnCanadian Forces Health Services Group (Atlantic), Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Justin TaitDepartment of Family Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Madeline HarlowDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Peter YangDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Brian BeaudetteCanadian Armed Forces, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Paul Dhillon12 (Vancouver) Field Ambulance, Canadian Forces Health Services Group, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Nijmegen Marches are an annual event in which military participants complete four consecutive days of 40-kilometre marches. Load carriage requirements differ among nations. The objective of this review is to apply a Gender-based Analysis Plus (GBA+) lens to injury prevention and consider the appropriateness of sex-based load carriage requirements. Methods: Two independent literature searches were undertaken using the MEDLINE database. A title and abstract screening review was conducted of articles reporting on gait biomechanics or injury risk related to load carriage that were published in English in the past 30 years. Thirteen articles were included in the review. Results: Four studies looked at sex-specific biomechanical adaptations to load carriage, with two reporting no significant differences and two reporting differences that may increase the risk of hip or knee injuries among women. Individuals who marched with a stride length longer than their natural or preferred length had more range of motion in their lower extremities and greater impact force; thus, they may be at a higher risk of injury. Weight carried was also identified as a risk factor, but the literature suggests that both sexes respond similarly to increased load as a proportion of body mass. Discussion: On the basis of the literature reviewed, no evidence-based recommendations can be made for sex-specific load carriage requirements in endurance marching. The published literature suggests that event standards for load carriage based on individual characteristics such as body weight or height may be more effective for injury prevention.

Indexed as

biomechanicsCanadafemaleGBA+Gender-based Analysis Plusload carriagelower extremity injuriesmalemarchingmilitaryNijmegenoccupational healthoccupational injuriespreventionsex

Identifiers

PMID42534120
PMCPMC13391200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.