ArticleJournal of military, veteran and family health2026
Policy in implementation science: Considerations for measurement-based care in the Canadian Armed Forces.
Article in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Policy, an intricate and often-overlooked aspect of implementation science (IS), can be leveraged to facilitate the mobilization and uptake of evidence-based practices. However, there are varying conceptualizations of policy in research and practice, and multiple approaches to the policy-making process. This article brings together a selection of literature and current guidance on policy using an IS lens, focusing specifically on the use of policy as an implementation strategy or lever to increase the uptake of interventions and evidence-based practices. The article uses the Canadian Armed Forces' (CAF's) implementation of measurement-based care (MBC) as a case example to discuss IS implications regarding policy. The CAF adopted an MBC system in 2014, coinciding with the consistent evolution of its mental health system. Although MBC is mandatory within the parameters outlined in the current directive (policy), adherence has consistently fallen below target level. The authors provide a brief overview of early implementation milestones for MBC in the CAF and describe the guiding policy in its current form. The authors draw from the IS literature on policy development and implementation, including elements of contextual adaptation and stakeholder consultation, to frame a series of considerations for refining the policy approach to MBC in the CAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.