ReviewJournal of military, veteran and family health2023
Efficacy and safety of CounterFlow in animal models of hemorrhage.
Review in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Local delivery of tranexamic acid for hemorrhage control in trauma: a narrative review.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hemorrhage is a major cause of battlefield mortality, contributing to 91% of potentially survivable combat-related deaths. Death from hemorrhage often occurs in pre-hospital settings, and more efficacious hemorrhage control interventions are needed to extend survival and enable casualties to reach definitive surgery. CounterFlow is a novel topical hemostatic agent that uses self-propelling particles to deliver thrombin and tranexamic acid against active bleeding. It achieves and maintains hemostasis at the site of injury through a combination of mechanical, biological, and chemical effects. Methods: All literature in which CounterFlow was tested in animal models of hemorrhage was reviewed to compile its preclinical safety and efficacy as a hemostatic agent. Results: CounterFlow extended survival and halted hemorrhage in multiple animal models that mimicked common and deadly injuries encountered in military and civilian settings, including junctional wounds, surgical bleeding, non-compressible intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Thromboembolism, tissue damage, and toxicity were not observed. Discussion: This narrative review discusses the animal models that have been used to investigate CounterFlow as a hemostatic agent for pre-hospital hemorrhage control. Future directions and potential expansion for civilian use are also considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.