Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534073›Full record

ReviewJournal of military, veteran and family health2023

Efficacy and safety of CounterFlow in animal models of hemorrhage.

Nuoya Peng, Han H Yeh, Adele Khavari, Han Zhang-Gao, Catherine Tenn, Hugh A Semple, Massimo F Cau, Andrew Beckett, Christian J Kastrup

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nuoya PengMichael Smith Laboratories and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Han H YehDepartments of Surgery, Biochemistry, Biomedical Engineering, and Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Adele KhavariMichael Smith Laboratories and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Han Zhang-GaoMichael Smith Laboratories and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Catherine TennDefence Research and Development Canada, Suffield Research Centre, Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada.
Hugh A SempleDefence Research and Development Canada, Suffield Research Centre, Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada.
Massimo F CauMichael Smith Laboratories and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Andrew BeckettDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christian J KastrupMichael Smith Laboratories and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hemorrhage is a major cause of battlefield mortality, contributing to 91% of potentially survivable combat-related deaths. Death from hemorrhage often occurs in pre-hospital settings, and more efficacious hemorrhage control interventions are needed to extend survival and enable casualties to reach definitive surgery. CounterFlow is a novel topical hemostatic agent that uses self-propelling particles to deliver thrombin and tranexamic acid against active bleeding. It achieves and maintains hemostasis at the site of injury through a combination of mechanical, biological, and chemical effects. Methods: All literature in which CounterFlow was tested in animal models of hemorrhage was reviewed to compile its preclinical safety and efficacy as a hemostatic agent. Results: CounterFlow extended survival and halted hemorrhage in multiple animal models that mimicked common and deadly injuries encountered in military and civilian settings, including junctional wounds, surgical bleeding, non-compressible intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Thromboembolism, tissue damage, and toxicity were not observed. Discussion: This narrative review discusses the animal models that have been used to investigate CounterFlow as a hemostatic agent for pre-hospital hemorrhage control. Future directions and potential expansion for civilian use are also considered.

Indexed as

battlefieldbiocompatible materialsbleedingblood coagulationclottingCounterFlowemergency medicinefibrinolysisfirst aidinjuriesmilitary personnelprehospitalresuscitationsurgerytraumawounds

Identifiers

PMID42534073
PMCPMC13391193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.