Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534066›Full record

ArticleJournal of military, veteran and family health2025

Where do moral injuries come from? A relational conception of moral practice and experience.

Christa Davis Acampora, Ditte Marie Munch-Jurisic, Sarah Denne, Jacob Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christa Davis AcamporaDepartment of Philosophy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
Ditte Marie Munch-JurisicDepartment of Philosophy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
Sarah DenneDepartment of Religious Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.
Jacob SmithDepartment of Philosophy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The predominant account of the etiology of moral injuries among Veterans and military personnel in the clinical psychological and psychiatric literature construes morality as inherent in belief structures. This supports the conceptualization of moral injuries as intrapsychic phenomena resulting from exposure to high-stakes events in which fixed beliefs are contravened in ways that result in psychological harms, including maladaptive beliefs and distress. The authors identify several problems with this formulation and offer suggestions for modification, including greater focus on 1) experiences rather than events in identifying circumstances in which moral injuries occur and 2) degradation of relevant relationships rather than conflicts with and among moral contents. These shifts in framing could have epidemiological salience, facilitating more robust case characterization and enabling a variety of approaches to re-establishing the moral conditions that support life affirmation.

Indexed as

familiesmilitarymoral experiencemoral injurymoralitypotentially morally injurious eventsrelationshipstreatmentVeterans

Identifiers

PMID42534066
PMCPMC13391190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.