Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534058›Full record

SynthesisJournal of military, veteran and family health2025

Drivers and barriers to experience in adaptive sporting events: A systematic review and call for further research.

Julia Gervasio, Natalie Ein, Jenny J W Liu, Clara Baker, Lauren Roberts, Emre Umucu, Nicholas Held, Fardous Hosseiny, Martin Colclough, Andrea Phelps and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Julia GervasioMacDonald Franklin Operational Stress Injury Research Centre, Lawson Research Institute, London, Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8207-3988
Natalie EinMacDonald Franklin Operational Stress Injury Research Centre, Lawson Research Institute, London, Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9581-4183
Jenny J W LiuMacDonald Franklin Operational Stress Injury Research Centre, Lawson Research Institute, London, Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2213-1346
Clara BakerMacDonald Franklin Operational Stress Injury Research Centre, Lawson Research Institute, London, Ontario Canada.
Lauren RobertsMacDonald Franklin Operational Stress Injury Research Centre, Lawson Research Institute, London, Ontario Canada.
Emre UmucuSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Nicholas HeldCollege of Health Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, United States.
Fardous HosseinyCanadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Martin ColcloughAtlas Institute for Veterans and Families, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea PhelpsWingman Adaptive Sports Programmes, Amesbury, England, United Kingdom.
Emmanuel AbreuPhoenix Australia Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
Brenda LauCHANGEpain Clinic, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Anthony NazarovCHANGEpain Clinic, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3288-7609
J Don RichardsonCHANGEpain Clinic, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2927-6735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Adaptive sports offer active duty members and Veterans with physical or psychological injuries the opportunity to engage in sports with a focus on psychosocial recovery, rehabilitation, and overall well-being. This rapid review examined the experiences of competitors and their families and friends in the Invictus Games, Warrior Games, and winter adaptive sports programs to identify primary facilitators and barriers influencing participation. Methods: Following Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Rapid Reviews (PRISMA-RR) guidelines, the authors reviewed 156 articles, applying self-determination theory as an analytical framework. Results: For competitors, social relatedness (e.g., camaraderie) and competence (e.g., goal attainment, skill mastery) emerged as the primary motivators. For family and friends, witnessing competitor growth and progress was the main motivator. Key barriers for both groups included competitive pressures and limited resources, which sometimes conflicted with the rehabilitative goals of these programs. Discussion: Adaptive sports programming should consider the motivations of individual participants, as well as those of their family and friends, in its design. This review underscores the need for strategies that support sustainable, meaningful participation and informed policy and support practices that respect the rehabilitative ethos of adaptive sports.

Indexed as

adaptive sporting programsbarrierscompetitorsdriversfamily and friends

Identifiers

PMID42534058
PMCPMC13391194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.