Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534056›Full record

SynthesisJournal of military, veteran and family health2025

What interventions can improve social connections for military partners? A scoping review.

Amy Johnson, Nadia Mead, Ali Hickling

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy JohnsonSchool of Education and the Arts, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-6265
Nadia MeadSchool of Education and the Arts, Central Queensland University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9702-2382
Ali HicklingSchool of Education and the Arts, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-4578

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Social connection is a key component of all people's well-being, but especially for that of military partners, who are required to navigate their lives without consistent support from their partner or extended family network. Military service can also disconnect partners from ordinary civilian life and affect their health, well-being, and employment status. Despite the understanding that social connection is a key part of promoting well-being, knowledge of how to support and drive social connectedness for this group is less well established. Methods: This scoping review identified and synthesised the available literature on existing interventions for military partners. The review was guided by the research question "What interventions are aimed at improving the social connections of military partners?" Results: The scoping review identified key concepts, prior interventions, and gaps in the research. It established that although a significant body of literature addresses how partners and families provide social connection for the military member or Veteran, interventions that specifically address social connection for the partners themselves are limited. Discussion: Partners were framed in the literature as the providers of or connectors to social connection, rather than the recipients of social connection. This has potential ramifications for the well-being of partners as well as for the dynamics within military-connected family units.

Indexed as

family-based interventionsmilitary familiespartnersscoping reviewsocial connectionsocial support

Identifiers

PMID42534056
PMCPMC13391174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.