ArticleJournal of military, veteran and family health2023
A peer support training and supervision program for Veterans and families: Development and preliminary results.
Article in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Behavioural health peer support bridges service gaps and provides benefits in at-risk populations such as military Veterans. Existing training methods vary considerably. There are few data examining the impact of these trainings and few studies addressing supervision of peers. The study team adapted and piloted peer support training (PST) used in fire service for Veterans and Veteran family members (V/VFM) in Texas, United States. Texas has many Veterans and rural communities and a shortage of mental health providers. Methods: V/VFM completed the PST followed by six monthly supervision calls. Participants completed pre-training measures of engagement and self-efficacy and post-training measures evaluating training components, satisfaction/credibility, and changes in self-efficacy. Results: Results indicate this curriculum was feasible and acceptable. During follow-up, participants reported being satisfied with supervision, increased self-efficacy, and increased numbers of outreach attempts/successful outreach attempts. Discussion: This study describes one method of using peer support to extend mental health care in a state with access challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.