ArticleJournal of military, veteran and family health2025
Initial efforts to enhance the R2MR Mental Health Continuum Model.
Article in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating Road to Mental Readiness wellness checks for CAF search and rescue technicians.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Road to Mental Readiness (R2MR) Mental Health Continuum Model (MHCM) is a mental health self-monitoring tool that allows individuals to self-map their mental health status on six domains using descriptors ranging in severity from healthy to reacting, injured, ill. The goals were to improve the validity of this tool by adding sub-domain descriptors from each domain (Study 1) and assessing whether the addition of these sub-domain descriptors to the domain descriptors resulted in more accurate self-mapping along the MHCM (Study 2). Methods: In Study 1, 159 Regular Force members completed a matching task in which they were presented with descriptors and asked to select the MHCM anchor that each belonged to. In Study 2, 274 Regular Force members completed several validated scales and mapped themselves on the MHCM using the descriptors selected in Study 1. Results: In Study 1, subsets of sub-domain descriptors were selected that optimized the accuracy mapping scores for all domains and most anchor categories. In Study 2, the addition of sub-domain descriptors enhanced the validity of the MHCM tool for all domains and was associated with the highest correlations with validated scales; most coefficients exceeded concurrent validity thresholds. Discussion: These findings provide initial support for the enhanced validity of a MHCM tool that should allow military members to better identify changes in their mental health status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.