Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533988›Full record

ReviewJournal of military, veteran and family health2023

Mechanisms of integration in psychedelic-assisted therapy.

Nicole S Coverdale, Douglas J Cook

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicole S CoverdaleCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Douglas J CookDepartment of Surgery, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In recent clinical trials, psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) led to symptomatic improvement among people with several psychiatric conditions. PAP has three distinct phases: preparation, support during psychedelic administration, and integration. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify randomized controlled trials that used PAP and synthesize the research base related to neuronal networks and neural function as measured with neuroimaging during the integration period and to link these findings to psychological changes after PAP. Methods: PubMed and ProQuest databases were searched using key words. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to determine whether an article would be reviewed. The authors specifically focused on articles that used neuroimaging or reported a psychological outcome one day or more after psychedelic administration. Results: Most articles used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and, in particular, resting-state fMRI to assess functional connectivity. Results generally reported changes in higher-order networks, although the direction of change in strength of connectivity was variable. Themes related to psychological findings were linked to increases in psychological and cognitive flexibility, increased openness, and decreased neuroticism after psychedelic treatment. Discussion: In general, more consistent methodology across the field should be applied to make progress in understanding network-based changes underlying clinical improvements after PAP. Limited evidence suggests that changes in the executive control network, and in its integration with other networks, may result in greater cognitive flexibility during the integration period.

Indexed as

cognitiveintegrationmilitaryneuroimagingpsychedelic-assisted psychotherapypsychedelicspsychiatricVeterans

Identifiers

PMID42533988
PMCPMC13293224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.