Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533983›Full record

ArticleJournal of military, veteran and family health2025

Intangible rewards and the workplace well-being of civilian Department of National Defence employees.

Ann-Renée Blais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ann-Renée BlaisTreasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Since the onset of the COVID-19 global pandemic, individuals have had an opportunity to re-evaluate the role of work in their lives. Shifts in worker values offer employers the possibility of revisiting their offerings in ways that optimize employee experiences and well-being while also considering employee heterogeneity. These offerings typically include traditional compensation elements, as well as non-financial, or intangible, rewards. Positioning intangible rewards as job resources, the present study explored the moderating influences of employee characteristics on the relationships between these resources and workplace well-being among civilian employees of the Department of National Defence (DND). Methods: This study consisted of secondary analyses of the 2022 Public Service Employee Survey microdata, restricted to DND employees. Specifically, latent moderation analyses regressed emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction on employee characteristics (i.e., disability status, leader status, age), intangible rewards (e.g., support for flexible work arrangements [FWAs], a manageable workload), and their interactions. Results: Overall, higher levels of recognition were associated with reduced emotional exhaustion, and greater support for FWAs was related to increased job satisfaction. The remaining relationships were more nuanced. For instance, support for FWAs was a stronger protective factor of emotional exhaustion among persons with disabilities relative to persons without disabilities, and workload management was a stronger determinant of job satisfaction among leaders compared with non-leaders. Discussion: Notwithstanding its limitations, this study has preliminary implications for research and practice, especially with respect to the recruitment and retention of key workforce segments.

Indexed as

civilianjob resourcesofferingrewardsvalue propositionwell-being

Identifiers

PMID42533983
PMCPMC13293147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.