Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533972›Full record

ArticleJournal of military, veteran and family health2026

Pharmacogenomics testing to optimize medical countermeasures against chemical warfare agents and bacterial biothreats in military settings.

Samuel Chekabab, John Mikler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samuel ChekababDefence Research and Development Canada, Suffield Research Centre, Department of National Defence, Suffield, Alberta, Canada.
John MiklerDefence Research and Development Canada, Suffield Research Centre, Department of National Defence, Suffield, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pharmacogenomics testing is a promising tool for strengthening medical countermeasures against military threats such as chemical warfare agents and bacterial biothreats. This review assesses the role of pharmacogenomics in military health care, highlighting distinct requirements in defence compared to civilian settings. Methods: We conducted a systematic review (PubMed, 2010-25) to identify publications focusing on pharmacogenomics, nerve agent susceptibility, and tularemia treatment. Key search terms included combinations relevant to genetic factors affecting chemical and bacterial threat responses. Studies were evaluated for genetic variations influencing nerve agent toxicity, related treatment responses, and antibiotic pharmacogenomics. Results: Genetic variants substantially impact susceptibility to nerve agents and the effectiveness of countermeasures. Polymorphisms in acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) modify toxicity risk and treatment response to oximes, atropine, and benzodiazepines. For bacterial biothreats, genetic factors affect antibiotic efficacy and risk for adverse reactions, especially with aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines. Sex and gender differences in pharmacogenomic responses are important yet under-recognized. Discussion: Integrating pharmacogenomic testing in military health care has the potential to improve force protection and operational readiness for chemical and biological threats. Nonetheless, challenges remain, including cost, logistical feasibility in mass casualty events, and the development of rapid deployable testing platforms. Future research should emphasize validation studies and implementation strategies tailored for military needs.

Indexed as

biothreatschemical warfare agentsmilitary medicinepersonalized therapypharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID42533972
PMCPMC13293134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.