Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533966›Full record

ArticleJournal of military, veteran and family health2025

Psychological health and safety in the Canadian Defence Team.

Alla Skomorovsky, Justin Chamberland, Nadine Charanek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alla SkomorovskyDirector General Military Personnel Research and Analysis, Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Canada.
Justin ChamberlandDirector General Military Personnel Research and Analysis, Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Canada.
Nadine CharanekDirector General Military Personnel Research and Analysis, Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Canada's defence policy, Methods: An online survey was administered to stratified random samples from each component in the spring or summer of 2022. The final sample included 4,463 Reg F members, 1,318 P Res members, and 2,866 DND PS personnel. Results: Despite moderate morale, burnout, psychological distress, and affective commitment to the CAF/DND, DT personnel are generally satisfied, engaged, and not planning to leave within the next 12 months. Several workplace factors, particularly pride in organizational membership and perceptions of organizational support, were associated with outcomes of interest among all groups. Meaningful work was a key driver only among CAF members. The strength of associations between workplace factors and outcomes of interest varied across components. Discussion: These results aim to help CAF/DND leadership foster DT personnel's well-being and improve the organizational culture, with tailored recommendations that address the specific needs of each component.

Indexed as

Canadian Armed Forcesgroup climatehealthy work environmentmilitary personnelperceived organizational supportpsychological distresspsychological well-beingteam psychological safetytransformational leadership

Identifiers

PMID42533966
PMCPMC13292986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.