Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533900›Full record

ReviewJournal of military, veteran and family health2025

Measuring life skills among Veterans: A systematic review of published instruments.

Jasmine C Mah, Tanvir Jassal, David Mikhail, Tom Hoppe, Dawn Herniman, Bruno Guévremont, Hélène Le Scelleur, Rachel J Couban, Jason W Busse, Dena Zeraatkar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jasmine C MahDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Tanvir JassalDepartment of Anesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
David MikhailTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tom HoppeChronic Pain Centre of Excellence for Canadian Veterans, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dawn HernimanChronic Pain Centre of Excellence for Canadian Veterans, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Bruno GuévremontChronic Pain Centre of Excellence for Canadian Veterans, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Hélène Le ScelleurChronic Pain Centre of Excellence for Canadian Veterans, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Rachel J CoubanDepartment of Anesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jason W BusseDepartment of Anesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Dena ZeraatkarDepartment of Anesthesia, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Supporting the well-being of Canadian Veterans is a key policy objective of Veterans Affairs Canada, which led to the development of a seven-domain well-being construct: employment, finances, health, social integration, housing and physical environment, cultural and social environment, and life skills and preparedness. However, the usefulness of this construct depends on being able to reliably measure and operationalize each domain. This review addresses a gap by evaluating instruments measuring the life skills and preparedness domain, defined as knowledge and skills to navigate civilian life after military service. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of eight bibliographic databases, identifying instruments measuring life skills and preparedness. We used the COSMIN checklist and criteria to assess bias risk and evaluate instrument measurement performance. Veteran partners evaluated the instruments for applicability and clarity. Results: Of 1,472 records screened, 13 publications describing nine instruments were included - five measured life skills and preparedness among Veterans and four in the general community. Internal consistency among instruments was sufficient; however, other measurement properties were inconsistent. Only one, the Community Reintegration for Service Members - Community Adaptive Test, developed with and validated by Veterans, had high-quality evidence, but our partners were conflicted on its clarity and applicability. The Life Skills Development Inventory - College Form may be promising for younger Veterans; however, further validation is required including content validity and applicability to Veterans. Discussion: Further validation of some promising instruments is needed, or de novo creation of an instrument is required to measure life skills and preparedness for Canadian Veterans.

Indexed as

life skillsmeasurement toolsmilitary-civilian transitionpsychometricsVeteransVeterans’ healthwellness

Identifiers

PMID42533900
PMCPMC13292860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.