ReviewJournal of military, veteran and family health2025
Measuring life skills among Veterans: A systematic review of published instruments.
Review in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Supporting the well-being of Canadian Veterans is a key policy objective of Veterans Affairs Canada, which led to the development of a seven-domain well-being construct: employment, finances, health, social integration, housing and physical environment, cultural and social environment, and life skills and preparedness. However, the usefulness of this construct depends on being able to reliably measure and operationalize each domain. This review addresses a gap by evaluating instruments measuring the life skills and preparedness domain, defined as knowledge and skills to navigate civilian life after military service. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of eight bibliographic databases, identifying instruments measuring life skills and preparedness. We used the COSMIN checklist and criteria to assess bias risk and evaluate instrument measurement performance. Veteran partners evaluated the instruments for applicability and clarity. Results: Of 1,472 records screened, 13 publications describing nine instruments were included - five measured life skills and preparedness among Veterans and four in the general community. Internal consistency among instruments was sufficient; however, other measurement properties were inconsistent. Only one, the Community Reintegration for Service Members - Community Adaptive Test, developed with and validated by Veterans, had high-quality evidence, but our partners were conflicted on its clarity and applicability. The Life Skills Development Inventory - College Form may be promising for younger Veterans; however, further validation is required including content validity and applicability to Veterans. Discussion: Further validation of some promising instruments is needed, or de novo creation of an instrument is required to measure life skills and preparedness for Canadian Veterans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.