ArticleJournal of military, veteran and family health2024
There is a knowledge mobilization gap in musculoskeletal injury research in the military context.
Article in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to Young et al.'s 'Letter to the Editor'.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2025Article
- Response and clarification of: 'There is a knowledge mobilization gap in musculoskeletal injury research in the military context'.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) place a significant burden on military populations. While a considerable amount of research is being conducted to reduce the prevalence and impact of such injuries, rates of medical release due to MSKIs remain high. Military injury surveillance framework and research programs could be more successful if communication was improved by 1) engaging leadership at each step, 2) translating and disseminating findings directly to support personnel (e.g., health care professionals, physical training staff), and 3) presenting and discussing findings with service members to educate them and to interpret results. This article highlights a gap in knowledge sharing between the research community, military members, and practitioners supporting humans in uniform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.