Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533870›Full record

ArticleJournal of military, veteran and family health2023

Conceptualization of moral injury: A socio-cognitive perspective.

Amanda Bonson, Dominic Murphy, Vicky Aldridge, Neil Greenberg, Victoria Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Moral injury prevention and intervention.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Experiences and impact of moral injury in prisons.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda BonsonResearch Department, Combat Stress, Leatherhead, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Dominic MurphyResearch Department, Combat Stress, Leatherhead, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Vicky AldridgeResearch Department, Combat Stress, Leatherhead, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Neil GreenbergInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Victoria WilliamsonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As research into moral injury (MI) develops, a clearer conceptualization is needed to support further research and development of treatments. This article draws on the existing MI literature and proposes a new model for its conceptualization. The authors propose that central to MI is deterioration in the relationship with self, others, and humanity, leading to global belief and behavioural changes. A definition of what is, and is not, a potentially morally injurious event (PMIE) is also presented, and the authors argue that events need to be high stakes and threaten previously held beliefs, regardless of the event's outcome. The model highlights key predisposing factors that may influence the later development and maintenance of MI, such as adverse childhood experiences and factors surrounding the event. By considering what distinguishes PMIEs from

Indexed as

adverse childhood experiencesconceptualizationmilitarymoral injuryPMIEposttraumatic stress disorderpotentially morally injurious eventPTSDtreatmentVeterans

Identifiers

PMID42533870
PMCPMC13292905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.