ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2026
Understanding obesity treatment choices: a mixed-methods study of patient preferences and shared decision-making.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundShared decision-making (SDM) is recommended in obesity treatment. Yet, little is known about how it occurs in real-world practice, particularly given recent advances in treatment options. PURPOSE: This prospective mixed-methods study aimed to understand patient preferences and decision-making processes for obesity treatment.
methodsAdults with obesity (N = 103) seeking specialty weight management treatment completed a survey, and a subset (n = 17) participated in qualitative interviews. Both assessed weight loss history, knowledge and expectations of obesity treatment options, decision-making factors, and perceptions of SDM.
resultsParticipants reported an average of 10.1 (SD = 13.5) prior weight loss attempts and were primarily motivated by physical well-being (86.4%). Key factors influencing decision-making included desired weight loss (84.5%), provider recommendations (76.7%), and cost (62.1%). Anti-obesity medications were viewed most favorably, followed by behavioral and surgical approaches. Qualitative analysis generated four themes: (i) a chronic cycle of weight loss and regain; (ii) guided by stories, not science alone; (iii) navigating trade-offs in choosing weight-loss strategies; and (iv) feeling heard, but still seeking direction.
conclusionsPatients demonstrate strong awareness of obesity treatments and value SDM and personalized recommendations when making decisions. Findings highlight the need for interventions that strengthen SDM and deliver tailored, high-quality health communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.