ArticleJournal of military, veteran and family health2023
Critical intercession for non-religious Canadian Veterans on the intersections of moral injury, religion, and spirituality.
Article in Journal of military, veteran and family health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the growing acceptance of the concept of moral injury, there has been increasing interest in the role religion and spirituality play in the risk for, experience of symptoms of, and potential treatment for this form of posttraumatic-stress-related psychological distress. Although many studies indicate the potential for religion and spirituality to contribute to the understanding and treatment of moral injury, it is important to note that this predominantly U.S.-based research tends to naturalize American Christian conceptualizations of religion, frequently conflating religion and spirituality in the process. A key question is whether this culturally specific form of religiosity is applicable to Veterans and military service members who are non-American, non-Christian, polytheistic, or even secular or atheist. On the basis of observations made during long-term ethnographic research with Canadian Veterans, this article amplifies concerns voiced by Veterans that should be considered when applying an American Christian conceptualization of religion and spirituality to non-American, non-Christian individuals or contexts. This intercession draws attention to the possibility that applying ideas of religion and spirituality may not only have limited benefit in the Canadian context, but that it could also create barriers to care and even further harm to non-religious individuals experiencing moral injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.