Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533755›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of public health2026

Evaluating the effect of cigarettes smoking on oesophageal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis with dose-response relationships.

Ayaka Teshima, Irene Possenti, Daniele Bertacchi, Vincenzo Bagnardi, Claudia Specchia, Cristina Martinez, Esteve Fernández, Silvano Gallus, Alessandra Lugo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ayaka TeshimaTobacco Control Unit, WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-4025
Irene PossentiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Daniele BertacchiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo BagnardiDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Claudia SpecchiaDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1443-7874
Cristina MartinezTobacco Control Unit, WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Esteve FernándezTobacco Control Unit, WHO Collaborating Centre for Tobacco Control, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Silvano GallusDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8967-0400
Alessandra LugoDepartment of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4297-6496

Funding

Italian League against CancerMinistry of Universities and Research, Government of Catalonia 2021SGR00906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oesophageal cancer (OC) affects over 600 000 people annually, with tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption as primary risk factors. We aimed to synthesize existing evidence to quantify the dose-response relationship between smoking and OC risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, examining case-control and cohort studies published up to April 2026. Pooled relative risks (RR) were estimated using random-effects models. Dose-response relationships by intensity, duration, and time since quitting of smoking were modelled using log-linear models, with linear or spline terms based on model fit. Of 221 eligible articles, 178 original studies were included. Compared with never smokers, the pooled RR of OC was 2.68 (95% confidence interval; CI: 2.37-3.03; n = 66) for current smokers, 1.71 (95% CI: 1.54-1.90; n = 61) for former smokers, and 2.15 (95% CI: 1.98-2.34; n = 144) for ever smokers. For current smokers compared with never smokers, the risk was 3.03 (95% CI: 2.42-3.79; n = 35) for squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and 2.25 (95% CI: 1.80-2.82; n = 14) for adenocarcinoma (OAC). OC risk increased non-linearly with smoking intensity, linearly with smoking duration, and decreased linearly with time since quitting. This meta-analysis reinforces the strong association between smoking and OC, with higher risk for OSCC than OAC. The observed non-linear dose-response relationship indicates that the risk of OC increases sharply even at low levels of smoking intensity, doubling below nine cigarettes and tripling below 17 cigarettes per day. These findings support complete smoking avoidance as the most effective prevention strategy of OC.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID42533755
PMCPMC13424440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.