ArticleKorean journal of family medicine2026
Sense of coherence and health-related outcomes among patients with breast cancer: a systematic review.
Article in Korean journal of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with breast cancer frequently experience substantial psychological burden and persistent symptoms. Sense of coherence (SOC), a central construct of the salutogenic framework, has emerged as a key psychosocial resource for chronic illnesses. However, its association with diverse health-related outcomes in patients with breast cancer has not yet been systematically investigated. This systematic review examined the association between SOC and health-related outcomes in patients with breast cancer. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, and literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from inception through October 2025. A total of 28 eligible studies were included. A higher SOC was consistently associated with greater psychological well-being and lower symptom burden, including pain, fatigue, and insomnia. SOC was also positively associated with quality of life (QoL), especially in the emotional, social, cognitive, and role-functioning domains. Some studies have suggested that a higher SOC is associated with more favorable QoL outcomes during the treatment phases. Evidence on the clinical prognosis is limited, with only one study examining survival outcomes reporting a positive association between SOC and survival. In conclusion, higher SOC was consistently associated with various health-related outcomes among patients with breast cancer, including psychological adjustment, symptom burden, and QoL. These findings suggest that higher SOC is associated with more favorable health-related functioning and overall well-being in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.