SynthesisThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Predictive Models for Motor Outcomes From Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive Models for Motor Outcomes From Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease, but the extent of improvement in motor symptoms varies. A tool which accurately predicts patient outcomes based on data available pre-surgery would be useful for clinical decision-making and patient expectation management. Such data includes clinical and cognitive measures, neuroimaging, kinematics, functional connectivity and genetics. In this systematic review, we assess predictive models of motor outcomes from DBS. We searched the databases Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus for primary research articles that tested predictions from models based on pre-surgical data and focused on motor outcomes from DBS for Parkinson's disease. We identified 19 studies fitting these criteria. The studies with high statistical power and generalisability use only clinical data and have limited accuracy. Studies including other types of data, such as magnetic resonance imaging, may have high accuracy but are under-powered. Predictions are mostly limited to the first year after surgery, subthalamic nucleus-targeted DBS and sum scores of motor performance. Following the results of the systematic search, we discuss candidate input and output variables and validation strategies to produce predictive models that are ready for translation to clinical practice. Ideally, models would predict scores for several motor domains, over a range of time after surgery, with confidence intervals. They should also be generalisable to clinics worldwide. To achieve this goal, models and datasets should be made publicly available to enable wider validation. These recommendations provide a framework to achieve predictive models for DBS outcomes that can be used clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.