Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533400›Full record

ArticleMuscle & nerve2026

Diagnostic Performance of the Strength-Duration Test for Bedside Screening of Critical Illness Polyneuropathy and/or Myopathy: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study.

José Roberto de Deus Macedo, Emerson Fachin-Martins, Marilia Mendes Rodrigues, Marta Rodrigues de Carvalho, Rubens Nelson Morato Fernandez, Paulo Eugênio Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

José Roberto de Deus MacedoHealth Sciences and Technologies PhD Program, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias Em Saúde, Campus UnB Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8239-6496
Emerson Fachin-MartinsHealth Sciences and Technologies PhD Program, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias Em Saúde, Campus UnB Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9858-9009
Marilia Mendes RodriguesPhysical Therapy Division, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Instituto de Gestão Estratégica de Saúde do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil.
Marta Rodrigues de CarvalhoNeurophysiology Division, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Instituto de Gestão Estratégica de Saúde do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8616-6735
Rubens Nelson Morato FernandezNeurophysiology Division, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Instituto de Gestão Estratégica de Saúde do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2978-0269
Paulo Eugênio SilvaPhysical Rehabilitation Division, Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Instituto de Gestão Estratégica de Saúde do Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9153-0848

Funding

Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal 00193-00002152/2023-95
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

aimsCritical illness polyneuropathy and/or myopathy (CIP/CIM) is a major cause of weakness in the intensive care unit (ICU). The availability of conventional electrodiagnostic testing may be limited. Alternative electrophysiologic methods, including the strength-duration test (SDT) and the stimulus electrodiagnosis test (SET), have been proposed as bedside screening adjuncts. This study aimed to evaluate the SDT's diagnostic metrics for CIP/CIM screening and to compare with the SET's performance.

methodsThis prospective, cross-sectional study included adult, mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Single assessment per patient comprised the peroneal simplified electrophysiological test (PENT), SDT, and SET. Using PENT as the reference test, we calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of SDT. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess the discriminative performance and optimal cutoff.

resultsSixty participants were enrolled, yielding 101 assessments, including bilateral evaluations when feasible. The SDT demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7-0.8, p < 0.001), with an optimal cutoff of 600 mC. At this cutoff, SDT showed a sensitivity of 73% (95% CI: 61-82), specificity of 68% (95% CI: 53-81), accuracy of 71% (95% CI: 62-79), and positive likelihood ratio of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.41-3.78) for screening probable CIP/CIM. The SET yielded an AUC of 0.7 (95% CI: 0.6-0.8, p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: The SDT showed potential as a bedside screening adjunct for CIP/CIM in the ICU setting. Further multicenter studies are required to validate these findings and to define the role of SDT in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthMuscular DiseasesPoint-of-Care TestingPolyneuropathiesAdultAgedCritical IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesElectrodiagnosisFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedNerve Conduction StudiesProspective Studieschronaxiecritical illness polyneuropathysensitivityspecificitystrength‐duration test

Identifiers

PMID42533400
PMCPMC13549163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.