ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026
Racial and Demographic Differences in Use of a Trauma Center Confidential Status Policy.
Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Racial and Demographic Differences in Use of a Trauma Center Confidential Status Policy.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesConfidential status is a hospital trauma center practice of restricting communication with all visitors of violently injured patients, including family and friends. The practice is intended to protect patients and staff from harm in situations involving violence or safety concerns, though it may have unintended negative impacts.
methodsA mixed-methods study using retrospective cohort and qualitative study designs was conducted at a single urban academic Level 1 trauma center with a confidential status practice. Using retrospective chart review of traumatically injured patients from 2015 to 2020, we performed multivariable logistic regression examining associations between placement on confidential status and patient characteristics including age, race/ethnicity, and intent of injury. Surveys and semi-structured interviews were conducted to examine knowledge of the confidential status policy and perceived effects on patient care and clinical workflow.
resultsOf the 42,540 traumatically injured patients were included, 319 were placed on confidential status. Those with confidential status were most commonly injured by assault (62%). Multivariable regression showed Black (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.97-3.68) and Latine (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.03-2.07) patients were more likely to be placed on confidential status compared to White patients. All survey respondents reported providing direct care for patients in which the confidential status was enforced; however, only 38% reported having read the policy. Most respondents reported neutral perceptions regarding the policy's impact on patient care and patient experience, while only 12% reported positive perceptions. Four qualitative themes were identified: family trauma, discrimination, stressed workplace environment, and policy ineffectiveness.
conclusionsRacial/ethnic differences were observed in the use of confidential status. Staff perceptions raised concerns regarding unintended negative effects of the policy on patients and families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.