Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533344›Full record

ReviewNeurological research and practice2026

Ethical challenges in treatment-goal transitions in invasively ventilated ALS: a case-based topical review.

Sarah K Bublitz, Benedikt Becker, Antonia F Demleitner, Petra Dietz-Laukemann, Paul Lingor, Benno Littger, Stefan Lorenzl, Berend Feddersen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah K BublitzDepartment of Neurology, Agatharied Hospital, Hausham, Germany. sarah.bublitz@pmu.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3258-543X
Benedikt BeckerDepartment of Neurology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Antonia F DemleitnerDepartment of Neurology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Petra Dietz-LaukemannDepartment of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Paul LingorDepartment of Neurology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Benno LittgerDepartment of Neurology, Agatharied Hospital, Hausham, Germany.
Stefan LorenzlDepartment of Neurology, Agatharied Hospital, Hausham, Germany.
Berend FeddersenDepartment of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), eye movements often represent the last channel for intentional communication. While oculomotor function has traditionally been considered relatively preserved, emerging evidence indicates progressive impairment in long-term survivors on tracheostomy-invasive ventilation (TIV). As a result, eye-based communication may become increasingly unreliable before complete loss, challenging clinical decision-making and advance care planning (ACP).

methodsWe conducted a case-based topical review integrating clinical observation and literature to examine the trajectory of oculomotor decline, its impact on communication, and implications for treatment decisions. Three patients with ALS receiving TIV in a home-care setting illustrate key clinical and ethical challenges.

resultsAcross cases and literature, oculomotor decline followed a gradual trajectory from effective eye-tracking communication to a complete locked-in syndrome. We identify a transitional phase of communicative ambiguity, in which residual ocular signals persist but can no longer be reliably attributed to intentional, patient-controlled communication. This phase is characterized by increasing inconsistency of signals and a divergence between observable responses and their interpretive certainty, creating uncertainty in assessing patient preferences. IMPLICATIONS: Communicative ambiguity represents a clinically underrecognized but critical threshold in advanced ALS, marking the transition from direct patient autonomy to interpretative and surrogate-based decision-making. Failure to recognize this phase risks misinterpretation of patient intent and may undermine goal-concordant care. Timely and iterative ACP, initiated before communication becomes unreliable, is essential. We further propose four clinical pathways for treatment goal conversations, highlighting their differing implications for timing, symptom burden, and ethical decision-making.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisCommunicationDecisional capacityMoral distressTracheostomy-invasive ventilation

Identifiers

PMID42533344
PMCPMC13425970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.