ReviewNeurological research and practice2026
Ethical challenges in treatment-goal transitions in invasively ventilated ALS: a case-based topical review.
Review in Neurological research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), eye movements often represent the last channel for intentional communication. While oculomotor function has traditionally been considered relatively preserved, emerging evidence indicates progressive impairment in long-term survivors on tracheostomy-invasive ventilation (TIV). As a result, eye-based communication may become increasingly unreliable before complete loss, challenging clinical decision-making and advance care planning (ACP).
methodsWe conducted a case-based topical review integrating clinical observation and literature to examine the trajectory of oculomotor decline, its impact on communication, and implications for treatment decisions. Three patients with ALS receiving TIV in a home-care setting illustrate key clinical and ethical challenges.
resultsAcross cases and literature, oculomotor decline followed a gradual trajectory from effective eye-tracking communication to a complete locked-in syndrome. We identify a transitional phase of communicative ambiguity, in which residual ocular signals persist but can no longer be reliably attributed to intentional, patient-controlled communication. This phase is characterized by increasing inconsistency of signals and a divergence between observable responses and their interpretive certainty, creating uncertainty in assessing patient preferences. IMPLICATIONS: Communicative ambiguity represents a clinically underrecognized but critical threshold in advanced ALS, marking the transition from direct patient autonomy to interpretative and surrogate-based decision-making. Failure to recognize this phase risks misinterpretation of patient intent and may undermine goal-concordant care. Timely and iterative ACP, initiated before communication becomes unreliable, is essential. We further propose four clinical pathways for treatment goal conversations, highlighting their differing implications for timing, symptom burden, and ethical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.