ArticleBMC oral health2026
Factors associated with tooth wear in a Swedish adult population: a cross‑sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTooth wear encompasses the loss of dental hard tissues through processes including attrition, abrasion and erosion. Previous studies have identified potential associations with age, sex, salivary characteristics, socioeconomic factors and bruxism; however, findings remain inconsistent and often based on single-factor analyses. This study aimed to investigate factors associated with tooth wear, with emphasis on subject‑based bruxism, and to evaluate the relative contribution of bruxism in relation to demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and functional factors using a multivariate analytical approach.
methodsData were derived from cross-sectional dental surveys and examinations conducted in Jönköping, Sweden. Participants aged 20 to 80 years underwent standardised clinical examinations and completed questionnaires addressing oral health, symptoms, behaviours and sociodemographic factors. Tooth wear was recorded separately as erosive or physical wear (attrition or abrasion) and was also combined to represent overall tooth wear. Bruxism was assessed by subject-based self-report, and temporomandibular disorder was evaluated using the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index. Stimulated salivary flow rate and buffer capacity were measured. Associations between potential explanatory factors and tooth wear were analysed using generalised linear models, and between subjective assessments and tooth wear by Spearman rank correlations.
resultsAmong 909 eligible dentate participants with adequate occlusal support, 646 had complete datasets for multivariable modelling. Physical tooth wear showed near linear correlation with overall tooth wear, whereas association between overall tooth wear and erosive wear was moderate. In adjusted analyses, subject-based bruxism, higher age, and male sex were independently associated with a higher proportion of teeth affected by tooth wear. Tooth wear was also significantly associated with reduced self-perceived chewing capacity and aesthetics. No significant associations were observed for educational level, body mass index, number of remaining teeth, temporomandibular disorder, salivary flow rate, buffer capacity, or medical-condition-related attendance.
conclusionsIn this Swedish population, tooth wear was more strongly associated with physical loading than with erosive processes. Subject-based bruxism showed the strongest independent association with tooth wear, exceeding the impact of demographic factors. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of patient-reported clenching or grinding when evaluating tooth wear and support its potential role in identifying individuals with increased levels of tooth wear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.