ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Corneal endothelial morphology in patients with herpetic keratitis attending tertiary eye centre.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHerpetic keratitis is a common cause of infectious corneal disease and can result in long term visual morbidity. While its effects on the corneal epithelium and stroma are well recognized, its impact on the corneal endothelium remains less clearly understood. This study aimed to evaluate and compare corneal endothelial morphology, including endothelial cell density, cell size variability, and hexagonality, between eyes affected by herpetic keratitis and their contralateral unaffected eyes.
methodsThis hospital-based cross-sectional comparative study included 39 patients with unilateral herpetic keratitis, comprising 39 affected eyes and 39 contralateral unaffected eyes. All participants underwent corneal evaluation using non-contact specular microscopy (NIDEK CEM-530, NIDEK Co., Japan). Endothelial cell density, coefficient of variation, and percentage of hexagonal cells were recorded as measures of endothelial cell density and morphology. Central corneal thickness was also measured. Comparisons between affected and contralateral unaffected eyes were performed using paired statistical analysis.
resultsMean endothelial cell density was significantly lower in eyes affected by herpetic keratitis compared with contralateral unaffected eyes (2555.38 ± 474.05 vs. 2879.00 ± 270.26 cells/mm², p < 0.001). Affected eyes demonstrated a significantly higher coefficient of variation (34.92 ± 6.35% vs. 29.77 ± 6.57%, p < 0.001), indicating greater variability in endothelial cell size. The percentage of hexagonal cells was significantly reduced in affected eyes compared with unaffected eyes (61.10 ± 5.04% vs. 66.82 ± 3.97%, p = 0.02). Central corneal thickness did not differ significantly between affected and contralateral unaffected eyes.
conclusionsEyes with unilateral herpetic keratitis demonstrated reduced corneal endothelial cell density and hexagonality, along with increased variability in cell size compared with contralateral unaffected eyes, indicating corneal endothelial alterations associated with the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.