ReviewGlobal spine journal2026
AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Management of Spinal Tuberculosis.
Review in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Host Immune Competence as a Missing Variable in the Diagnostic Pathway for Spinal Tuberculosis.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Response to Letter to the Editor for AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Management of Spinal Tuberculosis.Global spine journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study designLiterature review with clinical recommendations.ObjectiveTo highlight impactful studies on the management of spinal tuberculosis (STB), identified by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma and Infection group, with recommendations for their integration into clinical practice.MethodsFour studies addressing key phases of STB management - imaging diagnosis, laboratory diagnosis, surgical indication and approach, and imaging-based healed status - were reviewed. Consensus recommendations of the KF opinion leaders were graded as strong or conditional following the GRADE methodology.ResultsAltini et al evaluated the diagnostic value of MRI and FDG-PET/CT in spondylodiscitis including STB; we conditionally recommend FDG-PET/CT as an adjunctive imaging modality when MRI is inconclusive, contraindicated, or limited by artifact. Hu et al developed a multivariable laboratory prediction model based on seven routine indices for early STB diagnosis, achieving an AUC of 0.947; we conditionally recommend this model as an adjunctive screening tool when definitive microbiological testing is delayed or unavailable. Tang et al compared anterior-only, posterior-only, and combined surgical approaches in thoracolumbar STB; we conditionally recommend a posterior-only approach as the preferred surgical strategy in most cases requiring operative treatment. Mittal et al evaluated FDG-PET/CT and contrast MRI for defining healed status and guiding treatment completion; we conditionally recommend FDG-PET/CT as an adjunctive tool when the treatment endpoint remains uncertain or MRI is limited by metallic implants.ConclusionThis review provides spine surgeons and clinicians with evidence-based, expert-graded recommendations to enhance standardization and effectiveness across the key clinical decision points in spinal tuberculosis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.