SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Neurocognitive outcomes after treatment of unruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms - a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive changes after treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery (AComA) aneurysms have been recognized for decades. Whether such deficits occur after elective treatment of unruptured aneurysms remains uncertain. A systematic search in MEDLINE (via PubMed and via Ovid), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL and PsycINFO was conducted from inception to 31 August 2025, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Duplicate records were removed prior to screening. Studies were eligible if they included adult patients undergoing elective treatment of at least 1 unruptured AComA aneurysm, reported pre- and post-treatment neurocognitive testing across at least one cognitive subdomain, and differentiated outcomes from other aneurysm locations. Critical appraisal was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. Eight studies comprising 95 patients were included. In most studies, patients underwent surgical clipping (n = 82), with a minority treated endovascularly (n = 13). In five out of eight studies, patients who underwent elective treatment of an AComA aneurysm had worse cognitive outcomes than patients with aneurysms at non-AComA locations. Neurocognitive deficits may be detected in a substantial proportion of patients undergoing elective treatment of unruptured AComA aneurysms when sensitive neuropsychological assessment is applied. However, the current evidence base is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity in neuropsychological assessment, and a predominance of surgically treated cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.