Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533202›Full record

Observational studyLasers in medical science2026

Low-level laser therapy and conventional treatment for diabetic foot ulcers: a case series.

Ariane Silva Pires, André Luiz Bandeira Dionizio Cardoso, Maysa Rodrigues Guedes, Francisco Gleidson de Azevedo-Gonçalves, Carolina Cabral Pereira da Costa, Patricia Ferracioli Siqueira Lemos, Hisadora Vaz de Souza, Bruna Maiara Ferreira Barreto Pires, Eugenio Fuentes Pérez Júnior

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ariane Silva PiresUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1123-493X
André Luiz Bandeira Dionizio CardosoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. andreluisdionizio@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8016-2349
Maysa Rodrigues GuedesUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Francisco Gleidson de Azevedo-GonçalvesInstituto Estadual de Hematologia Arthur de Siqueira Cavalcanti, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carolina Cabral Pereira da CostaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Patricia Ferracioli Siqueira LemosUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Hisadora Vaz de SouzaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruna Maiara Ferreira Barreto PiresInstituto Estadual de Hematologia Arthur de Siqueira Cavalcanti, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Eugenio Fuentes Pérez JúniorUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-0443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication of diabetes mellitus and are associated with prolonged healing, increased hospitalization, and risk of amputation. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT), a non-invasive and low-cost modality, has shown potential to accelerate wound healing by promoting tissue repair, cellular proliferation, and improved microcirculation. This study aimed to descriptively evaluate healing outcomes in patients with DFUs treated with LLT combined with conventional treatment care with conventional treatment alone. This prospective observational comparative study included 11 adults with diabetes and active neuropathic DFUs treated at a public podiatry outpatient clinic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (June 2023-July 2024). Participants were prospective screened and allocated to conventional treatment (CT, n = 5; 6 ulcers) or LLLT plus CT (n = 6; 9 ulcers). Healing progression was assessed using the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH), evaluating wound area, tissue type, and exudate. In the CT group, 1 ulcer (17%) healed completely, 2 (33%) improved, 2 (33%) remained unchanged, and 1 (17%) worsened. In the LLLT group, 5 ulcers (55.5%) healed completely and 4 (44.5%) improved, with no lesions worsening. The LLLT group also demonstrated shorter mean healing time, fewer clinical visits, and greater tissue repair than CT alone. The descriptive findings suggest that adjunctive LLLT may represent a promising supportive strategy for DFU management in real world outpatient care. Due to the observational design, non-random allocation, and limited sample size, causal inference cannot be established. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootLow-Level Light TherapyWound HealingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDiabetes mellitusDiabetic footLaser therapyNursing careWound healing

Identifiers

PMID42533202
PMCPMC13423913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.