Observational studyLasers in medical science2026
Low-level laser therapy and conventional treatment for diabetic foot ulcers: a case series.
Observational study in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication of diabetes mellitus and are associated with prolonged healing, increased hospitalization, and risk of amputation. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT), a non-invasive and low-cost modality, has shown potential to accelerate wound healing by promoting tissue repair, cellular proliferation, and improved microcirculation. This study aimed to descriptively evaluate healing outcomes in patients with DFUs treated with LLT combined with conventional treatment care with conventional treatment alone. This prospective observational comparative study included 11 adults with diabetes and active neuropathic DFUs treated at a public podiatry outpatient clinic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (June 2023-July 2024). Participants were prospective screened and allocated to conventional treatment (CT, n = 5; 6 ulcers) or LLLT plus CT (n = 6; 9 ulcers). Healing progression was assessed using the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH), evaluating wound area, tissue type, and exudate. In the CT group, 1 ulcer (17%) healed completely, 2 (33%) improved, 2 (33%) remained unchanged, and 1 (17%) worsened. In the LLLT group, 5 ulcers (55.5%) healed completely and 4 (44.5%) improved, with no lesions worsening. The LLLT group also demonstrated shorter mean healing time, fewer clinical visits, and greater tissue repair than CT alone. The descriptive findings suggest that adjunctive LLLT may represent a promising supportive strategy for DFU management in real world outpatient care. Due to the observational design, non-random allocation, and limited sample size, causal inference cannot be established. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.