Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533172›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

Do running frogs (Kassina fusca) exhibit hyperextended variation in the sound pressure level of advertisement calls?

T Ulmar Grafe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

T Ulmar GrafeDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. ulmar.grafe@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4468-7954

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GR 1584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic distance estimation in vocal species is fundamental for effective decision-making for territory defense, mate attraction, and eavesdropping predators and parasites. The most straightforward distance cue is sound pressure level. However, variation in sound pressure level within individuals is not well documented, even less the call-by-call variation that may occur within individuals, even though modulation of call amplitude will promote responses to fluctuating ecological contexts and challenges. In this study, I report on the variable and unpredictable pattern of sound pressure levels in the advertisement calls of individual running frogs, Kassina fusca. The sound pressure levels of all advertisement calls within a single calling bout were recorded for nine males. Median peak SPL between males varied between 89.5 and 98.4 dB and showed highly significant differences between males. Furthermore, the maximum change in SPL between successive calls of a male ranged between 1.7 and 12.7 dB. Run charts of each male indicated random patterns of variation in SPL's during the recorded call bout. The results of this study are best explained as a mechanism to interfere with accurate distance estimation, either by competitors, parasites, or predators.

Indexed as

AnuraVocalization, AnimalAnimalsMaleSoundSound SpectrographyCommunicationRangingRunning frogsSensory cuesSPL

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.