ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Video-based characterization of intraoperative bleeding patterns and hemostasis behaviors in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06128603 (Analysis of Intraoperative Bleeding Characteristics in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analysis of Intraoperative Bleeding Characteristics in Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically characterize intraoperative bleeding patterns during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and conduct an in-depth analysis of hemostatic behavior and its association with hemostasis quality.
methodWe retrospectively collected 210 LPD surgical videos from 15 centers across China (2018-2022), of which 190 were enrolled. Two surgeons manually annotated bleeding events, causes, surgical phases, anatomical locations, bleeding types (arterial, venous, lymph node-related), and hemostasis behavior assessments [good hemostasis (GH), poor hemostasis (PH)). A surgical instrument detection model deployed on the SurgSmart platform extracted per-frame instrument usage and duration data. Hemostatic behaviors-including phase duration, hemostatic instrument utilization patterns, hemostatic instrument switching frequency, and the hemostatic complexity index (HCI) based on Simpson's diversity index-were compared by bleeding type and hemostasis behavior assessment category.
resultsA total of 675 bleeding events were identified, occurring in 87.9% (167/190) of the surgical videos. The pancreatic uncinate process was recognized as the "high-risk bleeding zone," with the highest bleeding incidence observed in the superior mesenteric vein-portal vein axis (34.3%) and superior mesenteric artery-celiac trunk axis (17.4%). Venous bleeding was the most frequent type (n = 334, 49.5%), followed by arterial bleeding (n = 313, 46.4%) and lymph node-related bleeding (n = 28, 4.1%). Excessive tissue tension (41.6%) and incorrect anatomical plane dissection (28.1%) were the leading causes of bleeding. Regarding hemostatic behaviors stratified by bleeding type: venous bleeding exhibited the longest hemostasis duration (68.0 (30.0-148.0) s), and significant differences were observed in hemostatic instrument utilization patterns, instrument switching frequency, and the HCI across bleeding types (all P < 0.05). Comparisons between PH and GH groups revealed that PH groups had a significantly prolonged hemostasis duration (76.0 (29.0-171.5) s vs. 50.0 (24.0-118.0) s, P = 0.001), more frequent instrument switching (median 2.0 (0.5-6.0) vs. 1.0 (0.0-3.0), P < 0.001), and significantly distinct instrument utilization patterns (P = 0.004). Additionally, the HCI was significantly higher in PH groups than in GH groups (0.338 ± 0.233 vs. 0.286 ± 0.222, P = 0.008).
conclusionsOur study systematically characterized bleeding sites, causes, and surgical phases during LPD, identifying procedure-specific high-risk anatomical regions and distinct bleeding mechanisms. We demonstrated that hemostatic instrument utilization patterns vary by bleeding type and correlate with hemostasis quality, and proposed the instrument HCI as an objective instrument-based metric for summarizing hemostatic behavior.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, number NCT06128603.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42533168What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.