SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2026
Standardizing surgical equipment pick lists for sustainability: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurgical "pick lists" are compiled based on anticipated needs, without regular review. This leads to "overage"-supplies that are prepared but unused-with financial and environmental impacts. Standardization of lists is a strategy to reduce resource consumption and waste. This study collates the published impacts of pick list standardization initiatives on costs, outcomes, and provider satisfaction.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science.
resultsThe search identified 11 papers for inclusion. Most included surgeon education and a consensus-based process for optimization. Substantial cost savings were consistently reported, with no difference in adverse events. Changes in operative time were modest and variable. Only one study reported environmental impacts, with substantial potential savings. Initiatives were generally well received.
conclusionsAvailable evidence suggests that pick list standardization is safe, cost-effective, and acceptable to perioperative personnel, with potential environmental benefits that remain insufficiently explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42533166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.