ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2026
The Correlation Between Preoperative Psychological State and Postoperative Satisfaction in Aesthetic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global aesthetic surgery industry is expanding rapidly, with success increasingly defined by patient-reported outcomes. Postoperative satisfaction, a key metric, is strongly influenced by preoperative psychological state.
objectivesTo synthesize evidence on the relationship between preoperative psychological factors (e.g., body image, emotions, personality, expectations) and postoperative satisfaction.
methodsA narrative review was conducted, including studies on body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), body image dissatisfaction, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, personality, and motivations across various procedures.
resultsBDD is a consistent negative predictor of satisfaction, often a contraindication. Body image dissatisfaction, unrealistic expectations, and traits like neuroticism also correlate with lower satisfaction. Conversely, functionally motivated procedures (e.g., reduction mammaplasty) yield high, sustained satisfaction. Expectation-reality alignment is a core mediator. Surgical type, demographics, and time moderate the relationship. Standardized tools (e.g., BDDQ, FACE-Q) provide reliable assessment.
conclusionsPreoperative psychological state critically determines satisfaction. Integrating standardized screening, expectation management, and perioperative psychological support within a collaborative biopsychosocial model is essential for optimizing outcomes and patient well-being. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42533092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.