Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42533073›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2026

Complement deficiency and neonatal immunity: a serum-limited, context-dependent framework.

Doron Carmi, Uri Gabbay

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Doron CarmiBat-Heffer Community Health Center, Clalit Health Services, Bat-Heffer, Israel.
Uri GabbayGray Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel. medicounsel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4396-5446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly among preterm infants, who are at high risk of severe bacterial sepsis. Although this vulnerability has traditionally been attributed to global immune immaturity, emerging evidence supports the possibility that complement deficiency may represent an important contributor to impaired neonatal immune function. Complement activity and component levels are consistently reduced in newborns and correlate with gestational age. Functional studies show that neonatal neutrophils regain bactericidal capacity in adult serum, whereas neonatal serum suppresses adult neutrophil function, indicating that humoral factors play a major, though not exclusive, role in immune performance. We propose a hypothesis-generating framework in which neonatal immunity is influenced by complement availability within a broader network of humoral and cellular interactions. However, this model is challenged by the observation that fresh frozen plasma, despite increasing complement levels, does not improve clinical outcomes in neonatal sepsis. This discrepancy suggests that complement insufficiency may contribute predominantly to baseline susceptibility rather than to established sepsis physiology, where broader inflammatory mechanisms predominate. These observations support a context-dependent, hypothesis-generating model of neonatal immunity and highlight the need for prospective mechanistic and clinical studies evaluating functionally limiting complement pathways and targeted therapeutic strategies. IMPACT: Proposes a serum-limited framework linking complement immaturity to neonatal immune vulnerability. Integrates complement availability with developmental and microenvironmental context to explain variability. Provides a testable model with implications for risk stratification and targeted immunomodulation.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.