ArticleScientific data2026
A multi-paradigm and longitudinal EEG dataset including the "sixth-finger" and "affected-hand" motor imagery of stroke patients.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor imagery-based brain-computer interface (MI-BCI) applications in stroke rehabilitation aim to match brain activity with real-time feedback, thereby establishing closed-loop neural pathways and providing a basis for evaluating patients' neuroplasticity changes. Thus, constructing EEG datasets under MI paradigms is crucial for optimizing MI-BCI systems and understanding the neural rehabilitation process. However, the current limitations of single MI paradigms and the lack of relevant EEG datasets may restrict the accurate interpretation and effective application in stroke rehabilitation. This study collected EEG data from 24 stroke patients during MI tasks, including a novel "sixth finger" MI and an affected-hand MI paradigm. The dataset comprehensively covers the complete longitudinal stages of stroke rehabilitation: pre-training, post-training, and follow-up periods. The data materials include: (1) raw EEG data, (2) preprocessed data, and (3) patient clinical information. Preliminary analysis using classical machine learning algorithms (CSP + SVM and CSP + LDA) demonstrated an average classification accuracy between the two MI paradigms maintained at approximately 85%~86%. We anticipate that this dataset will facilitate research on MI-BCI paradigms and neuroplasticity for stroke, and contribute to the development of high-efficiency MI-BCI systems in the field of stroke rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.