ArticleNature communications2026
Rapid and quantitative measurement of bacteriophage infectivity via fully automated droplet digital PCR.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical translation of phage therapy for multidrug-resistant infections is constrained by the lack of rapid, standardized therapeutic phage selection. Here, we introduce digital phage susceptibility testing (dPhaST), an automated droplet digital PCR workflow that quantifies phage-induced DNA release as a molecular signature of lysis. By targeting conserved 16S rRNA regions, dPhaST measures lytic activity across diverse bacterial pathogens within 3 h. Across 122 phage-host combinations involving 19 bacterial strains from six species, dPhaST shows 95.9% concordance with spot tests while resolving weak and heterogeneous lytic activities that are not readily distinguished phenotypically. It remains robust during the early infection window despite phage-encoded nuclease activity and tolerates phage cross-contamination better than spot tests. The method captures defense-mediated interactions involving CRISPR-Cas and Sir2-HerA systems. In this work, we show that automated digital quantification enables rapid and mechanistically informative profiling of early phage lytic efficacy across Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.