ArticleACR open rheumatology2026
Biosimilar Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Compared to the Originator: A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the six-month effectiveness and safety of rituximab biosimilars compared to the originator in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and outcomes following originator to biosimilar switching.
methodsWe recruited adults with GPA or MPA treated with the rituximab originator or a biosimilar for induction or maintenance, or who switched from originator to biosimilar maintenance (2018-2023). Participants either started the treatment within the preceding six months or were recruited from vasculitis research cohorts. Outcomes included six-month remission (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score [BVAS] version 3 of 0), relapse (BVAS rise after achieving remission requiring treatment), vasculitis damage, and serious adverse events (SAEs).
resultsWe studied 207 participants from 9 centers: 132 starting induction (58 originator and 74 biosimilar), 59 starting maintenance (23 originator and 36 biosimilar), and 16 in the "switch" group. Mean age was 56.7 years (SD 17.5), 52% were female, 80% were White, and 70% had GPA. At six months from induction, 51 of 53 (96%) originator and 66 of 73 (90%) biosimilar recipients achieved remission (difference 6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4% to 15%), whereas at three months (exploratory) 48 of 51 (94%) and 57 of 72 (79%) recipients, respectively, had achieved remission (difference 15%, 95% CI 2% to 26%). All individuals in the maintenance and "switch" subgroups were in remission at six months. One minor relapse occurred in each of the induction groups and in the originator maintenance group. Change in vasculitis damage and SAEs were not significantly different between groups.
conclusionThis study found no significant differences in six-month outcomes between the rituximab originator and biosimilars for induction of GPA and MPA, with no concerning early signals in those initiating maintenance or switching from the originator to a biosimilar.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.