SynthesisBMJ paediatrics open2026
What works in educational interventions for teams caring for children and young people admitted to general acute paediatric wards for mental health? A systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically review educational interventions for staff working on acute paediatric wards aimed at improving the care of children and young people (CYP) admitted for mental health support.
designWe conducted a systematic search of PubMed, The Education Resources Information Centre, PsychInfo and Web of Science from 2000 to March 2026 using terms related to healthcare professionals, training/education, mental health and children/young people. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Interventions were classified using the Kirkpatrick model and the Behavioural Change Technique Taxonomy (BCT V.1) to identify mechanisms underpinning effective change.
resultsWe found nine studies meeting inclusion criteria, across a range of teaching methodologies and settings. Most interventions were designed and applied for nurses. Overall quality of evidence was poor. Although no single intervention could be recommended, analysis identified potentially useful components tailored to different learner needs, mapped through the Kirkpatrick and BCT frameworks. A notable gap was a lack of codesign with CYP and carers with lived experience and the absence of strategies to engage ambivalent or reluctant learners who might not attend educational interventions voluntarily.
conclusionsExisting educational interventions contain elements that may support behavioural and practice change among staff caring for CYP with mental health needs. However, future research should prioritise high-quality, framework-based evaluations developed through codesign with CYP and carers. Interventions should also address how to engage learners who may be reluctant to participate in training for this area of clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.