ReviewRNA (New York, N.Y.)2026
Diversity and genome engineering applications of R2 non-LTR retrotransposons.
Review in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The R2 retrotransposon family has been a leading model system for studies of site-specific non-long-terminal-repeat retrotransposon mobility. More recently, avian R2 systems have been harnessed to implement stable sequence supplementation of the human genome. Investigations of R2 retrotransposons range from detailed biochemical studies of purified components to elucidation of the cellular processes that support new retrotransposon insertions. In addition, molecular and genetic studies have examined the persistence and diversification of R2 retrotransposons across animals. In publications starting from early 2024, an R2-encoded protein has been used in native form, or after modification, to insert transgene sequences of choice into heterologous genomes lacking an endogenous R2. Many of these genome engineering studies were launched using a historically accumulated reporting of R2 sequences informative for understanding retrotransposon evolution but not intended as a catalog of active R2 retrotransposons. Other groups approached R2 sequence identification by using or building consensus retrotransposon sequences from mostly short-read genome sequencing or genome assemblies. Here, we describe R2 sequence discovery, phylogeny, and annotation, and we consider their influence on R2 protein applications including gene addition to the human genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.