ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
The landscape of academic global surgery in Canada: a national environmental scan.
Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal surgery has emerged as a critical domain within global health, but despite growing academic interest, the structure, scope, and organization of global surgery initiatives within Canadian academic institutions remain incompletely characterized. We sought to conduct a national environmental scan of academic global surgery initiatives in Canada, examining participant characteristics, the structure and focus of initiatives, community motivations, and future priorities.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, survey-based study between July 2024 and April 2025, targeting Canadian physicians, trainees, researchers, and health professionals involved in global surgery. We invited participants via professional networks, academic institutions, and the trainee network of the Canadian Global Surgery Trainees' Alliance. The survey included both quantitative and qualitative items across 4 domains. We used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to analyze responses.
resultsForty respondents from 10 Canadian medical schools completed the survey, representing diverse surgical specialties and career stages. Most were affiliated with university-based global surgery offices (62%). Engagement was highest in research (65%), teaching (55%), and capacity building (55%), with trainees playing a central role. Key barriers included limited funding (95%), infrastructure gaps (70%), and lack of training opportunities (54%). Motivations for involvement included commitment to health equity, education, and sustainable partnerships. Respondents also identified future priorities, including training and education, improving access to surgical resources, and enhancing mentorship and evaluation frameworks.
conclusionThis study offers an overview of Canadian global surgery efforts, revealing enthusiastic but fragmented engagement. Findings highlight opportunities to strengthen coordination, formalize training structures, and improve sustainability within global surgery programs in Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.