ArticleBMJ global health2026
How community dialogues influence norm change around female genital mutilation: a mediation analysis from a high-burden Kenyan setting.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFemale genital mutilation (FGM) remains highly prevalent in parts of Kenya, including Narok County, where marriageability expectations and social sanctions continue to sustain the practice. Although community-dialogue interventions are central to strategies to end FGM, evidence on their effects and mechanisms of influence remains limited.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 2658 respondents (1272 women and 1386 men) aged 15-60 years in Narok County in 2024. The primary exposure was participation in mixed-sex community dialogues with participation in couples-only dialogues as secondary exposure. Outcomes were measured using survey items adapted from established FGM and social norms literature, including a composite index of beliefs favourable to cutting and single-item measures of intention to cut a daughter, perceived marriageability expectations and opposition to FGM. Analyses used generalised estimating equations, predicted probabilities and generalised structural equation models to assess mediation pathways.
resultsParticipation in community dialogues was associated with more progressive norms, including lower odds of endorsing pro-cutting beliefs (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.76), intending to cut a daughter (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.64) and perceiving uncut girls as unmarriageable (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.66), and higher odds of opposing FGM (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.84 to 3.11). Couples-only dialogues had smaller and less consistent associations. Predicted probabilities indicated substantial positive associations among participants exposed to community dialogues alone or combined with couples' sessions. Mediation analysis showed that 88% of the effect of community dialogues on opposition to FGM indirectly linked through shifts in pro-cutting beliefs, intentions to cut and marriageability expectations, with intentions representing the strongest linkages.
conclusionCommunity dialogues are strongly associated with shifts in the social expectations and intentions that underpin FGM in a high-burden Kenyan context. These findings provide support for dialogue-centred strategies to eliminate FGM. Beliefs, intentions and marriageability norms are key intermediate indicators for monitoring normative change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.